Can art be used as a political tool?

This article links to ‘Fake News – A Worldwide Challenge‘.

The article is Level B1+/B2 and is suitable for lycéens in Premier and Terminale, including the LLCER Anglais programme : Theme 1 Axe 2.

You can download the article from Payhip, with it’s French translation and a separate reading comprehension excercise for free. 

You can find it here at Payhip ‘Can art be used as a political tool?’ and use it for study or teaching purposes.

Read this article in French

Introduction

For centuries, art has been a powerful means of expression. It transcends linguistic and cultural barriers to touch humanity as a whole. However, beyond its aesthetic and expressive function, art can also serve a political role, becoming a tool for influencing, educating, mobilising or criticising. So the question arises: can art be considered a political instrument? To answer this question, we will examine the arguments for and against this idea, by analysing various historical and contemporary examples.

Art as a political tool: arguments in favour

Art has often been used to convey political messages and mobilise the masses. Twentieth-century Mexican muralism, with artists such as Diego Rivera, David Alfaro Siqueiros and José Clemente Orozco, is emblematic of this use.

These artists painted monumental frescoes highlighting the struggles of the working classes, the history of colonisation and revolutionary ideals. These works not only educated the masses, but also galvanised a sense of national pride.

Propaganda posters

Another striking example is propaganda posters, which were widely used during the world wars. Countries such as Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, the United States and Great Britain all used graphic art to influence public opinion and mobilise citizens. These posters used striking visuals to evoke strong emotions, whether fear, patriotism or anger.

Inequality and violences

In apartheid South Africa, artists such as William Kentridge used their art to denounce racial inequality and systemic violence. Through animated films, drawings and performances, Kentridge succeeded in drawing international attention to the injustices of the South African regime.

Contemporary art is not to be outdone. Banksy, the famous British street artist, is a modern example of an artist using his talent to convey political messages. His works denounce war, mass surveillance, economic inequality and migration crises. Thanks to his anonymity, Banksy reinforces the idea that art can be a weapon against systems of oppression.

Limits and arguments against the political use of art

Loss of purity and independence

However, using art as a political tool is not without controversy. Some critics believe that art loses its purity and independence when it becomes an instrument in the service of an ideology. This instrumentalism can reduce art to a mere propaganda tool, where the artist’s creativity and authenticity are sacrificed in favour of a political agenda.

Nazi Germany, for example, used art to glorify its ideology. Exhibitions such as ‘Degenerate Art’ – Entartete Kunst – aimed to discredit modernist artists while promoting an ‘official’ art that served the aims of the regime. Such manipulation shows how art can be emptied of its essence when it is too closely associated with politics.

Stifled creativity

Another example is the Soviet Union, where socialist realism dominated the art scene for decades. Artists were forced to produce works that celebrated Communist ideals and glorified figures such as Lenin and Stalin. This uniformity stifled creativity and prevented the emergence of diverse artistic movements. Political art can therefore become a tool of oppression when it is used to impose a single way of thinking.

Fragmentation of public opinion

Moreover, some argue that the interpretation of art is subjective, and that politically motivated works risk polarising the public or reinforcing existing divisions. In a world where public opinion is increasingly fragmented, political art can sometimes fail to bring people together and instead exacerbate tensions.

Countries using art for political ends

Some countries have openly used art as a lever to influence their society. China, for example, has made extensive use of painting, sculpture and performance art to promote the values of the Communist Party. During the Cultural Revolution, art was strictly regulated to serve the interests of the government. Posters depicting Mao Zedong as a quasi-divine figure are a striking example.

Similarly, North Korea remains a modern example where art is strictly controlled to promote the cult of personality around its leaders. Music, film and even dance are used to glorify the regime and maintain collective support for the country’s ideals.

Conclusion

The versatile nature of art makes it an undeniably powerful tool for conveying political ideas. Whether to mobilise, educate or denounce, it has the potential to touch hearts and minds. However, this function is not without its limits and dangers.

The instrumentalism of art can stifle creativity, polarise society or become a mere vehicle for propaganda. It is therefore crucial that artists retain their freedom of expression, even when tackling political themes.

Ultimately, political art is a double-edged sword. It can enlighten, inspire and transform, but it can also divide, manipulate and oppress.

The key is to find a balance, where art remains true to its essence while helping to shape a better world.